Participation in decision-making processes means a possibility for citizens, civil society organisations and other interested parties to influence the development of policies and laws which affect them. 

• Creating fair policies/laws reflective of real needs enriched with additional experience and expertise;
• Facilitating cross-sector dialogue and reaching consensus;
• Adopting more forward and outward looking solutions;
• Ensuring legitimacy of proposed regulation and compliance;
• Decreases costs, as parties can contribute with own resources;
• Increasing partnership, ownership and responsibility in implementation;
• Strengthening democracy – preventing conflict among different groups and between the public and the government and increasing confidence in public institutions.

• In regulating the procedure for consultation institutions and organizations in Europe have highlighted several principles which guide the process. Some of those include:

  1. Public participation is based on the belief that those who are affected by a decision have a right to be involved in the decision-making process.
  2. Public participation includes the promise that the public’s contribution will influence the decision.
  3. Public participation promotes sustainable decisions by recognizing and communicating the needs and interests of all participants, including decision makers.
  4. Public participation seeks out and facilitates the involvement of those potentially affected by or interested in a decision.
  5. Public participation seeks input from participants in designing how they participate.
  6. Public participation provides participants with the information they need to participate in a meaningful way.
  7. Public participation communicates to participants how their input affected the decision.

(1) Access to information: Access to information is the first, basic and important right which is underlying the whole process of participation. Whilst it means that the government informs the public about its plans and the types of documents it wants to adopt at the beginning of the process, it also highlights  the right of the public to have access to all information (e.g., drafts, comments and reasoning) throughout the process. The access to information is a right regulated in specific laws. While at this level there is no need for intensive interaction between the government and the public, the government should not apply measures which would prevent the public from receiving the information crucial for the process.

(2) Consultation: Consultation is a form of participation where the government invites the public to provide its opinion, comments, views and feed-back on a specific document. Whilst the issues on which the public is consulted are defined by the government, this process should also allow for the public to express opinion on other issues contained in the draft. Consultation can be organized with a broader group of participants from the public. It is a reactive way of participation – the public becomes involved because the government requests this. However, this is not to say that the public cannot request to be consulted. Indeed, it should act and remind the governmental bodies about the need to be asked to comment on laws which will affect them.

(3) Active engagement through dialogue and partnership: Active involvement (partnership) in law making means collaboration and jointly undertaken responsibilities at all stages of the decision-making process (agenda setting, issue identification, drafting, decision and implementation). It is the highest form of participation; it may be described as a situation where the representatives of the public share a seat at the table with the government representatives. The initiative can come from both the sides. Whilst there should be an agreement about the common goals of the process, those involved from the public should be able to retain their independence, and to advocate and campaign for the solutions which they want to see adopted. Dialogue is as an active form of participation. Indeed, dialogue is prerequisite for collaborative relationship. It requires “a two-way communication built on mutual interests and potentially shared objectives to ensure a regular exchange of views.” The dialogue is an underlying form of a collaboration which is built around a specific issue of interest and should lead to commonly agreed outcomes. 

To ensure that the essential contributions of CSOs are enshrined in the political decision-making process without discrimination, an enabling environment is required. Conditions of an enabling environment include:

• the rule of law,
• adherence to fundamental democratic principles,
• political will,
• favourable legislation,
• clear procedures,
• long-term support and resources for a sustainable civil society and
• shared spaces for dialogue and cooperation.

These conditions allow for a constructive relationship between NGOs and public authorities built on reciprocal trust and mutual understanding for participatory democracy.